<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Underground</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.multiplereflections.org/journal/2007/10/30/the-underground/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.multiplereflections.org/journal/2007/10/30/the-underground/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 13:19:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAGA</title>
		<link>http://www.multiplereflections.org/journal/2007/10/30/the-underground/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>JAGA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 00:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.multiplereflections.org/journal/2007/10/30/the-underground/#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Thank you wandering sail, Austin, JIP, and Keepers. 

Wandering Sail -- Thanks for thinking of us.  It was good to see you Thursday night. :-)

Austin -- Thanks for the validation.

JIP -- Thanks for hearing us.  It&#039;s okay now.

Keepers -- No, we didn&#039;t try that particular one.  We tried another reverse look-up.  We did try the link you gave us and came up with nothing.  However, it is a moot point at this time.

We received another call from this phone number the other day and we answered it.  It was a recording that we&#039;ve heard before (but some of us swear it had a different caller ID name to it, but maybe not).  Anyway, it was a call about presumably our car warranty having expired, etc.  Hahahaha.  Definitely meant for somebody else when they had our phone number before we got it.  Our car is from 1989, 196K plus on it, and at the moment, it isn&#039;t running.

Anyway, so of course it isn&#039;t anything bad or weird to us.  Besides, any of our usual freaky weird phone calls have always had no number visible or caller ID visible to it.  It was just really bad timing and a weird caller ID thing.  But it is good to know and a relief to know that really that was all it was... and some of us just getting a bit unnerved by it.  But now we know for sure it is okay.

Thanks again everyone.

Julies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you wandering sail, Austin, JIP, and Keepers. </p>
<p>Wandering Sail &#8212; Thanks for thinking of us.  It was good to see you Thursday night. <img src='http://www.multiplereflections.org/journal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Austin &#8212; Thanks for the validation.</p>
<p>JIP &#8212; Thanks for hearing us.  It&#8217;s okay now.</p>
<p>Keepers &#8212; No, we didn&#8217;t try that particular one.  We tried another reverse look-up.  We did try the link you gave us and came up with nothing.  However, it is a moot point at this time.</p>
<p>We received another call from this phone number the other day and we answered it.  It was a recording that we&#8217;ve heard before (but some of us swear it had a different caller ID name to it, but maybe not).  Anyway, it was a call about presumably our car warranty having expired, etc.  Hahahaha.  Definitely meant for somebody else when they had our phone number before we got it.  Our car is from 1989, 196K plus on it, and at the moment, it isn&#8217;t running.</p>
<p>Anyway, so of course it isn&#8217;t anything bad or weird to us.  Besides, any of our usual freaky weird phone calls have always had no number visible or caller ID visible to it.  It was just really bad timing and a weird caller ID thing.  But it is good to know and a relief to know that really that was all it was&#8230; and some of us just getting a bit unnerved by it.  But now we know for sure it is okay.</p>
<p>Thanks again everyone.</p>
<p>Julies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keepers</title>
		<link>http://www.multiplereflections.org/journal/2007/10/30/the-underground/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Keepers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 21:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.multiplereflections.org/journal/2007/10/30/the-underground/#comment-194</guid>
		<description>did you try this link to track back the phone number?

http://www.switchboard.com/swbd.main/dir/6_0/reverse.htm?mem=1

keepers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>did you try this link to track back the phone number?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.switchboard.com/swbd.main/dir/6_0/reverse.htm?mem=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.switchboard.com/swbd.main/dir/6_0/reverse.htm?mem=1</a></p>
<p>keepers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jumpinginpuddles</title>
		<link>http://www.multiplereflections.org/journal/2007/10/30/the-underground/comment-page-1/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>jumpinginpuddles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 07:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.multiplereflections.org/journal/2007/10/30/the-underground/#comment-192</guid>
		<description>sorry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin</title>
		<link>http://www.multiplereflections.org/journal/2007/10/30/the-underground/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.multiplereflections.org/journal/2007/10/30/the-underground/#comment-189</guid>
		<description>Very, very bad timing I&#039;d say but your reaction is valid and understandable. 

Austin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very, very bad timing I&#8217;d say but your reaction is valid and understandable. </p>
<p>Austin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wandering sail</title>
		<link>http://www.multiplereflections.org/journal/2007/10/30/the-underground/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>wandering sail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 04:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.multiplereflections.org/journal/2007/10/30/the-underground/#comment-187</guid>
		<description>Really bad timing. There is an underground Seattle that is a tour of before the fire and then they just built over it. So there are places named that   are not related to your underground, or so it sounds. Take care I know Halloween is hard for yous. See yous tomorrow. A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really bad timing. There is an underground Seattle that is a tour of before the fire and then they just built over it. So there are places named that   are not related to your underground, or so it sounds. Take care I know Halloween is hard for yous. See yous tomorrow. A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
